COMPARING STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND PERCEPTION OF COMPETENCE ON SUMMATIVE SCIENCE PERFORMANCE TASKS VERSUS WRITTEN SCIENCE SUMMATIVE TESTS AT THE SIXTH GRADE LEVEL

2.50
Hdl Handle:
http://hdl.handle.net/11290/608052
Title:
COMPARING STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND PERCEPTION OF COMPETENCE ON SUMMATIVE SCIENCE PERFORMANCE TASKS VERSUS WRITTEN SCIENCE SUMMATIVE TESTS AT THE SIXTH GRADE LEVEL
Authors:
Barnes, Carli Ruth
Abstract:
This study examines the effects on student performance of designing performance tasks based on the Next Generation Science Standards. It also assesses sixth grade students’ accuracy in determining their final test scores on both traditional written unit final tests and final performance tasks. Eighty-four sixth graders in four different classes were studied across four different science units. Two classes formed Sample A and two classes formed Sample B. They alternated taking traditional written end of unit tests and taking performance tasks instead. They recorded their predicted scores and their feelings about each test on a survey immediately after testing. The study’s results are inconclusive. While the teachers felt less confident preparing students for the performance tasks, students appeared to prefer them, and did moderately better on them. How much better was not found to be statistically significant, though. Students in Sample B consistently outperformed Sample A on all assessments, but Sample A students reported having studied for final tests more often. In all, this study shows how middle school students can be unpredictable and are not always self aware, but do prefer to be engaged in hands-on learning. There may be something to be said for student enjoyment of an assessment, even if the final scores students earn on non traditional tests are only moderately better.
Affiliation:
Montana State University
Issue Date:
2015
URI:
http://hdl.handle.net/11290/608052
Submitted date:
2016-02-29
Document Source:
Dissertation/Thesis
Language:
English Paper
Type Of Resource:
Empirical Research
Empirical Methodology:
Quantitative
Learning Environment:
Formal
Subjects:
Middle/Secondary School
Construct:
Content Knowledge Affective Belief/Identity Motivation/Attitude Assessment
Content:
Sun-Earth-Moon (includes Seasons and Lunar Phases)
Nation:
USA
Appears in Collections:
Astronomy Education Research

Full metadata record

DC FieldValue Language
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Carli Ruthen
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-04T09:00:53Zen
dc.date.available2016-05-04T09:00:53Zen
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.date.submitted2016-02-29en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11290/608052en
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the effects on student performance of designing performance tasks based on the Next Generation Science Standards. It also assesses sixth grade students’ accuracy in determining their final test scores on both traditional written unit final tests and final performance tasks. Eighty-four sixth graders in four different classes were studied across four different science units. Two classes formed Sample A and two classes formed Sample B. They alternated taking traditional written end of unit tests and taking performance tasks instead. They recorded their predicted scores and their feelings about each test on a survey immediately after testing. The study’s results are inconclusive. While the teachers felt less confident preparing students for the performance tasks, students appeared to prefer them, and did moderately better on them. How much better was not found to be statistically significant, though. Students in Sample B consistently outperformed Sample A on all assessments, but Sample A students reported having studied for final tests more often. In all, this study shows how middle school students can be unpredictable and are not always self aware, but do prefer to be engaged in hands-on learning. There may be something to be said for student enjoyment of an assessment, even if the final scores students earn on non traditional tests are only moderately better.en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2016-05-04T09:00:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 a4b150c7-e56e-4d07-9477-89f265f018bd.pdf: 4087542 bytes, checksum: 3ac5b6b7a08437ce6183095e91aacab5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015en
dc.language.isoEnglish Paperen
dc.titleCOMPARING STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND PERCEPTION OF COMPETENCE ON SUMMATIVE SCIENCE PERFORMANCE TASKS VERSUS WRITTEN SCIENCE SUMMATIVE TESTS AT THE SIXTH GRADE LEVELen
dc.typeDissertation/Thesisen
dc.contributor.departmentMontana State Universityen
dc.type.resourceEmpirical Researchen
dc.istar.learningenvironmentFormalen
dc.istar.constructContent Knowledge Affective Belief/Identity Motivation/Attitude Assessmenten
dc.istar.contentSun-Earth-Moon (includes Seasons and Lunar Phases)en
dc.istar.nationUSAen
dc.istar.empiricalmethodologyQuantitativeen
dc.istar.subjectMiddle/Secondary Schoolen
All Items in International Studies of Astronomy Education Research Database are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.